|
REHOBOTH
BEACH
COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PDF Document with Index and
Maps
Approved -
August 18, 2003
Mayor and
Commissioners of the City of Rehoboth Beach
Certified -
August 19, 2004
Office of
State Planning Coordination
Constance C.
Holland, AICP, Director
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
PURPOSE
The
Comprehensive Development Plan is the principal document
outlining the City of Rehoboth Beach’s goals and
policies regarding the use of land. It has been designed
as a policy statement that should remain valid in the
face of change over the years. Properly used, the Plan
is the basis for decision-making at all levels of
government and will guide the public and private sectors
toward beneficial activities affecting its people and
land.
This Plan
has several specific purposes:
#
Create a unified set of goals for change and development
within and surrounding the City.
#
Become the
central source of guidance on proposed public activities
by coordinating them to ensure that each contributes to
the adopted goals.
#
Apply the
individual tools of planning within the framework of an
overall Plan so that regulation is not arbitrarily
applied.
#
Guide
private land use decisions by providing information on
the overall direction of the community.
#
Provide
analysis and policies that will allow assimilation of
the unexpected to the City’s advantage, turning problem
into opportunity.
#
Preserve the
more fragile among desirable land use arrangements and
harmonize the sometimes conflicting desires of
preserving an asset and using it.
And the
final purpose is to...
#
Help
Rehoboth Beach operates as a “citizen” of Delaware by
adopting and following the Land Use Goals for Delaware.
In 1999, the
Delaware Cabinet Committee on State Planning Issues
approved the “Strategies for State Policies and
Spending” which included an updated set of eleven Land
Use Goals for Delaware:
#
Direct investment and future development to existing
communities, urban concentrations, and growth
areas.
#
Protect
important farmlands and critical natural resource
areas.
#
Improve
housing quality, variety, and affordability for all
income groups.
#
Ensure
objective measurement of long-term community effects of
land use policies and infrastructure
investments.
#
Streamline
regulatory processes and provide flexible incentives and
disincentives to encourage growth in desired
areas.
#
Encourage
redevelopment and improve livability of existing
communities and urban areas, and guide new employment
into underused commercial and industrial
sites.
#
Provide high
quality employment opportunities for citizens with
various skill levels to retain and attract a diverse
economic base.
#
Protect the
state's water supplies, open spaces, farmlands, and
communities by encouraging revitalization of existing
water and wastewater systems and the construction of new
systems.
#
Promote
mobility for people and goods through a balanced system
of transportation options.
#
Improve
access to educational opportunities, health care, and
human services for all Delawareans.
#
Coordinate
public policy planning and decisions among state,
counties and municipalities.
This Plan
supports all of these “Livable Delaware” goals and
recognizes that those with land use implications and
critical natural resource relationships, i.e., inland
bays and ocean, and water quality, are particularly
important to Rehoboth Beach. With its very limited land
area, transportation access opportunities, and vacant
land, as well as the importance of its surrounding
waterways, Rehoboth is disproportionately impacted by
land use and transportation decisions made by other
jurisdictions. The very success of local decisions in
Rehoboth have attracted development on its edges whose
long-term environmental, financial, and transportation
impacts are unexamined and potentially detrimental to
the quality of life of residents, visitors, and the
community as a whole.
At the same
time, Rehoboth can make better decisions about its own
future. The critical element of this Plan is the Vision
of the City of Rehoboth Beach. All of the goals,
policies, and actions flow from this Vision as a means
to move from where we are today to where we want to be
in 15 or 20 years. Clearly, some steps are of higher
priority than others and, just as clearly, some steps
are easy and straightforward while others are more
uncertain and require further community dialog and
background effort. The Vision invites reflection,
examination, and understanding.
The
Comprehensive Development Plan provides the policy
framework for making choices about growth, change, and
preservation. With its adoption, all citizens will be
aware of the fundamental background against which
decisions will be made. Each choice about the
overall health and well-being of Rehoboth will not have
to be made anew if this Plan is adopted and used as an
accepted basis for decision-making. The 2003 Plan
is the single, comprehensive source of information and
direction about the future growth and management of
Rehoboth Beach.
1.2
PROCEDURE AND AUTHORITY
The State of
Delaware requires that each municipality prepare a
comprehensive development plan and that the plan be
reviewed and updated every five years. Plan
preparation and revision is the responsibility of the
Rehoboth Beach Planning Commission, a group of citizen
volunteers with an interest in and long-term commitment
to discovering the most appropriate uses of the physical
and fiscal resources of their community and coordinating
those uses with surrounding jurisdictions. In carrying
out its responsibilities, the Planning Commission has
chosen to base this update on the efforts and ideas of
its residents and property owners. In developing the
1996 Plan, the Planning Commission gathered data,
debated issues and possible solutions, and, through the
establishment of work groups and public hearings sought
widespread community input and advice. It was a
“home-grown” plan that taught its many contributors the
complexity and excitement of thinking about the future
and moving it through the political
framework.
Because the
1996 Plan was the first comprehensive look at Rehoboth
in many years, it was careful to spell out a series of
“visions” for the City as well as dozens of specific
actions to be taken to achieve those visions. Happily,
many of the recommended actions have been accomplished.
Chief among them was the establishment of a thriving
“Main Street” organization and the successful creation
and funding of a downtown development plan. Other
initiatives failed – most dramatically, the attempt to
revamp the zoning ordinance for better preservation of
residential design character.
Notwithstanding
the State’s mandate, the City’s successes and setbacks,
as well as economic and social change in the five years
since 1996 also call for a review of the Plan to find if
its provisions are still relevant to new conditions.
This Plan is the product of that review. It was prepared
with important contributions from individual
citizens and organizations.
Delaware
requires that a comprehensive development plan contain,
at a minimum, “a municipal development strategy setting
forth the jurisdiction’s position on population and
housing growth within the jurisdiction, expansion of its
boundaries, development of adjacent areas, redevelopment
potential, community character, and the general uses of
land within the community, and critical community
development and infrastructure issues. The comprehensive
planning process shall demonstrate coordination with
other municipalities, the county and the State during
plan preparation.”
In
acknowledgment of successfully meeting these conditions,
Delaware confers the Plan with a special
standing...”After a comprehensive plan or portion
thereof has been adopted by the municipality in
accordance to this chapter, the comprehensive plan shall
have the force of law and no development shall be
permitted except as consistent with the plan” (from
§702(d), Title 22, Delaware Code). This status places a
particular burden on the writers of the plan and the
elected officials considering its adoption. The
provisions of the plan define the stage for future
growth and change – zoning, subdivision regulations,
code enforcement, and infrastructure investment follow
and implement the plan. This means that the plan must
speak in a clear and strong voice to every citizen,
administrator, and official of Rehoboth.
2.
THE SETTING
2.1
LOCAL HISTORY
Rehoboth
Beach traces its development as a summer resort to 1872,
when a group of Wilmington Methodists agreed to
establish a camp meeting ground and religious resort on
the model of Ocean Grove, New Jersey. The following
year, the Association purchased 414 acres on the coast
and laid out meeting grounds, streets, and lots. The
“Rehoboth Camp Meeting Association of the Methodist
Episcopal Church” was formally established on January
27, 1873, and camp meetings began to be held the
following summer. Small frame houses called “tents” were
built surrounding a central tabernacle. Two hotels, the
Surf and the Bright, were constructed to serve the
influx of camp goers; a post office was opened, and a
boardwalk was built.
As more and
more summer visitors took an interest in visiting the
Rehoboth Camp Meeting Grounds, the activities there
commenced to take on a more secular flavor rather than a
religious one. The nearest railroad station was six
miles away at Lewes, however, and the relative
inaccessibility of the area restrained growth. This
situation changed in 1878 when the Junction and
Breakwater Railroad began passenger and freight service
to Rehoboth and constructed a depot on the west side of
town. The Henlopen Hotel was built in 1879, providing
additional accommodations for rail-borne vacationers. By
1881, camp meetings were discontinued, but were renewed
by local Methodists in the 1890's and continued until
the early 1900's.
Rail service
to the resort was enhanced in 1884 by the extension of
the main line to the east along Rehoboth Avenue,
bringing it within a few hundred feet of the shoreline,
and the construction of a spur to the south, ending at
the junction of Philadelphia Street and Laurel Avenue
where it served various commercial enterprises including
a concrete block factory and a fish pond.
By the end
of the 1880's, three leading figures of the resort
realized that a more regular form of government was
needed and they petitioned the State’s General Assembly
for a new charter. On March 19, 1891, the General
Assembly agreed and repealed the former charter of the
Camp Meeting Association (and of its successor, the
Rehoboth Beach Association). A new charter was issued,
establishing the area that had comprised the camp
meeting grounds as an incorporated municipality. Its
central purpose was stated as “the providing and
maintaining of a permanent seaside resort, and to
furnish the necessary and proper conveniences and
attractions requisite to the success of same.”
The turn of
the twentieth century saw numerous public improvements
in the community. The Lewes-Rehoboth Canal project
promised to improve freight transportation in the area.
Telephone service was started in 1899, gas lighting was
authorized in 1905, and electric service initiated three
years later. The first beach concessions were opened in
1903, the year the town elected its first mayor. The
town hall was built in 1906, and the fire company was
organized the same year. The public school opened in
1901 and received a new building in 1908. By 1913,
public water was available in Rehoboth.
A fire in
1913 devastated parts of Rehoboth and Baltimore avenues,
destroying a church, ten houses, two stores, a
four-story hotel, and a barn. The following year a storm
washed out Surf Avenue and destroyed the boardwalk,
pier, and pavilions.
The City’s
residential area expanded in the 1920's (coinciding with
the achievement of effective control of mosquitoes). In
1923, 150 acres of farmland adjacent to the City limits
on the south was developed as a residential subdivision
called Rehoboth Heights. This property became part of an
annexation in 1926 which increased the City’s boundaries
south to Silver Lake.
Rehoboth’s
substantial growth during the 1920's is attributable
largely to road improvements which made the resort more
readily accessible to tourists. The City was linked to
the concrete road leading to Georgetown by means of a
drawbridge in 1925. The streets within the town were
first paved in 1927; in the same year, the railroad spur
to Laurel Avenue was discontinued, reflecting the
increasing ascendancy of motor transportation. Passenger
rail service was abandoned the following year. The
lighthouse was moved to its present site in 1928(and
completely rebuilt in 1996). Between 1928 and 1931,
roads were constructed which linked Rehoboth with the
newly-completed DuPont Highway. The effect this had on
the resort community is reflected in the population
figures. In 1922, Rehoboth had 690 winter and 4,500
summer residents. By 1931, these numbers had grown to
795 winter and 6,000 summer residents. Six years later,
the City boasted 912 winter residents and its summer
population tripled to 18,000. School construction began
in 1939 and classes started in 1940. In 1959, the
second school opened. A storm destroyed the boardwalk
and some oceanfront property in 1962. The Town Hall was
dedicated in 1965. In 1969, the City of Rehoboth
Beach once again expanded its borders by annexing the
Schoolview neighborhood. Around 1950, this
property was purchased and had developed in response to
the building boom that took place after World War
II. In the late 1960s, the Country Club Estates
subdivision was developed on land that had previously
been the Rehoboth Beach Country Club and golf course.
The Anna Hazzard Museum opened in 1976, the library
moved to its present site in 1985 and an extensive
renovation was completed in 2000. The railroad station
was moved to its current location in 1987 and, in 1988,
the City received its first award as a Tree City, USA.
The boardwalk was again destroyed by a storm in
1992.
[Sources:
Sarah L. Burks and Kristi L. Guessing, “Rehoboth Beach,
Sussex County, Delaware: Architectural Survey Report, “
August, 1994; and Steven H. Moffson, “Architectural
Survey of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware,” August, 1990. Both
manuscripts are on file at the Delaware State Historic
Preservation Office, Dover, Delaware. This overview also
incorporates the comments and contributions of Warren
MacDonald, President, Rehoboth Beach Historical
Society.]
2.2
Local Population and Housing
According to
the 2000 Census, Rehoboth Beach has 1,495 full-time
residents with a median age of 57 (a drop from a median
age of 59 in 1990). Nearly 45% of these residents are
over age 60 (nearly 49% were over age 60 in 1990). While
the full-time population of the City is quite small, the
vacation season boosts the number significantly. The
daily population of Rehoboth Beach (residents and
non-resident visitors) in undocumented estimates ranges
from a low of 16,000 in April to a high of possibly
50,000 persons in August.
|
1990 –
2000 Rehoboth Beach Population and Population
Composition Change |
|
|
Total
Population |
Male |
Female |
Under
5 years |
6-18
years |
19-44
years |
45-64
years |
65+
years |
|
1990 |
1234 |
534 |
700 |
32 |
72 |
348 |
284 |
498 |
|
2000 |
1495 |
719 |
776 |
27 |
77 |
332 |
498 |
561 |
|
Change |
+261 |
+185 |
+76 |
-5 |
+5 |
-16 |
+214 |
+63 |
Several
studies over the last decade have included population
projections for the Rehoboth Beach area (see Sussex
2005: A Program For The Future - Sussex County; Rehoboth
Beach Capacity Study - University of Delaware; and The
Coastal Sussex Land Use Plan - Sussex County) and all of
them agree that the permanent population of the town
will not change significantly in the foreseeable future.
Review of the population projections leads to two
conclusions:
#
The number of permanent or overnight visitors inside the
City limits of Rehoboth Beach is not expected to
increase significantly unless there is a drastic change
in the use of housing stock or zoning;
#
The day
visitor population has the potential to increase
dramatically as a result of the increase in permanent
and seasonal housing in the rest of eastern Sussex
County and the increasing mobility of the
population.
According to
the 1990 Census, Rehoboth Beach contained 3117 dwelling
units with a median owner-occupied housing value of
$202,300. This median housing value was exceeded by
Dewey Beach, Fenwick Island, Henlopen Acres, and South
Bethany, but these communities had a combined total of
only 259 owner-occupied units in 1990. Year 2000 Census
information on housing value was not available for this
Plan but the real estate industry reports that home
prices in Rehoboth have risen a startling 300% over the
past decade.
|
Occupancy
Characteristics of Rehoboth Beach Housing Units
1990 – 2000 |
|
|
Dwelling
Units |
Owner
Occupied |
Renter
Occupied |
Vacant* |
|
1990 |
3117 |
466 |
204 |
2447 |
|
2000 |
3167 |
659 |
188 |
2320 |
|
Change |
+50 |
+193 |
-16 |
-127 |
*Nearly 80% of
these units are classified as “ For seasonal,
recreational, or occasional use.” These are
vacant units used or intended for use only in
certain seasons, for weekends, or other occasional
use
throughout the year. Seasonal units include
those used for summer or winter sports or recreation,
such
as beach cottages and hunting cabins.
Rehoboth has
added only 50 dwelling units and 261 new residents since
1990, but this does not mean that no change has
occurred. The use of the housing stock has begun to
significantly change and may continue to do so over the
next twenty years. The number of permanent citizens has
increased by over 21% in the last ten years, which is
more than the 17.6% statewide growth. Much of this can
be attributed to retiree-aged population. Baby boomers
will begin to retire in large number in 2008 (when the
oldest turn 62). While significant changes in city
infrastructure may not be necessary, these additional
permanent citizens will have an impact on city
appointees, employment, small businesses, volunteering,
voting population, and other areas.
The lack of
raw land for residential expansion has caused
significant redevelopment, numerous partitionings, and a
vast increase in the value of residential property. This
type of activity, while not producing large increases in
population, is producing an increase in housing density,
increased pressure on the remaining green areas (both
public and private), and a change in the visual
personality of the community.
The above
statistics indicate that only 20% of the residences are
full-time owner-occupied while approximately 80% of the
residences are not claimed as an owner-occupied dwelling
(the corresponding figures in 1990 were 15% and 85%
respectively). The best opinion is that most units, in
whole or in part, are offered for rent, for at least
some part of the year. Year-round residences are
uniformly scattered throughout the City with little
visual difference between full and part-time occupancy
except for activity on the street. A street by street
inspection in 1994 found 2,650 rental units, some 200
units are rented year-round and the remainder are
seasonal, monthly, weekly or subweekly rentals. The 2000
Census identified 1,918 vacant housing units that were
available for “seasonal, recreational, or occasional”
use. Of the 2,650 rental units located in 1994, only
about 1,000 (38%) were at that time licensed by the
City. Assuming a $5000/yr average rental income, private
rentals within the City generate somewhere in the
neighborhood of $13,250,000.
2.3
Impacts From Surrounding Areas
Like many
coastal counties, Sussex County has experienced
explosive growth over the last thirty years with
significant land use, environmental, and transportation
impacts on Rehoboth Beach. The population of Sussex
County increased from 80,356 in 1970 to 156,638 in 2000
(95%). The large seasonal population can increase the
base population by more than 200% on peak summer
weekends. The population is expected to increase an
additional 55% by 2020. The number of households is
projected to increase from 62,577 in 2000 to 73,282 in
2020.
Until the
mid-1990s, most of the County’s growth occurred in the
coastal communities and the coastline of the Inland Bays
(Indian River Bay, Little Assawoman, and Rehoboth Bay)
and their tributaries. In the mid-1990s, the growth
pattern of the County changed as growth along the
highway corridors increased and development shifted
inland away from the beachfront areas that are largely
built out. Development has also shifted to moderately
priced homes, large subdivisions, and golf course
communities, many of which serve a growing year-round
population that includes many retirees attracted to the
area by its natural environment and low property
taxes.
According to
“Projected Population Growth and the New Arithmetic of
Development in Delaware, 1990-2020 (Ames and Dear,
University of Delaware, May, 1999), the four County
Census Divisions of Eastern Coastal Section (Milton,
Lewes, Millsboro, and
Selbyville/Frankford)...
“will
grow from a population of 50,527 to one of 88,575 –
accounting for nearly 50% of the County’s population. In
addition, they will host much of the substantial
seasonal resort and retirement population. This increase
of 38,048 persons represents a projected growth of 75%.
Households will increase by 108% during the same period
increasing from 20,671 in 1990 to 40,043 in
2020.
“Eastern
Sussex County will become increasingly urbanized along
the spine of SR1 as a rapidly growing influx of retirees
adds year-round residents to coastal resort areas. By
the year 2020, nearly all of the County’s growth is
projected to come from the in migration of mostly older
persons who will settle in the east.”
This rapid
pace of development has caused a number of environmental
problems. Wastewater treatment plants serve
approximately 28% of the County’s population and are an
important source of nutrient problems. Overall, Rehoboth
Bay receives nutrient input from “point sources” (e.g
sewage treatment plants) and “nonpoint sources” such as
agricultural runoff, urban storm water runoff, septic
tanks and the atmosphere. (Delaware Inland Bays
Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan, June 1995).
More than 18,000 onsite sewage disposal systems are
permitted in the drainage basin of the Inland Bays and
discharge as much as 480,000 pounds of nitrogen and
250,000 pounds of phosphorus to soils annually with much
of the nitrogen entering the groundwater. One hundred
percent of the region’s drinking water and irrigation
water comes from groundwater. Bacterial loadings have
led to the partial closure of shellfish harvesting
waters in all three bays and development has resulted in
the loss and alteration of sensitive habitat and an
increase in storm water runoff pollution.
Population
growth has also increased demand for many County
services and has placed additional demands on all of the
incorporated coastal communities for access to their
amenities, their parking and community facilities,
libraries and transportation, and police and fire
services. Outlying commercial growth has also reshaped
the character of the traditional downtowns of the
coastal cities. County officials have generally been
supportive of growth and development because it
increases the tax base allowing expanded services
without a corresponding increase in property taxes. In
many respects, development along the coast has been a
source of funds to support services away from the coast.
With much of the growth occurring in unincorporated
areas of the County adjacent to existing coastal
communities, the older towns face growing demand on
their infrastructure and services with no opportunity to
derive funds from the growth that causes the
demand.
Population
impacts are probably best captured by the traffic
situation on SR1. Since the 1960s, SR1 north of Rehoboth
Beach has been widened from two lanes to six,
intersections have been improved, turn-lanes added, and
lights have been timed to aid flow, in an attempt to
deal with new commercial development in the area. But
traffic movement has continued to slow down. Traffic has
nearly tripled over this period to more than 35,000
vehicle trips on an average day and to more than 80,000
trips on the busiest weekend days. With basic commercial
services leaving the coastal towns to join commercial
concentrations along SR1, local residents are forced to
add their numbers to the growing congestion. This is
clearly reflected by the fact that over the past 10
years, total vehicle miles traveled in Sussex County has
risen by 24%. The history of a lack of coordination
between the City’s transportation needs, the County’s
land use decisions, and DelDOT’s highway projects is a
distinguishing characteristic of the growth-related
planning problems facing the area’s coastal communities.
These
concerns about the impacts of surrounding growth on the
future of Rehoboth Beach are discussed further in this
Plan in Chapter 8, Land Use and Regulatory
Planning.
3.
THE VISIONS
3.1
The Challenge
This
Comprehensive Development Plan seeks to assure that
Rehoboth Beach maintains its character as a comfortable,
small town and an active, prosperous resort. And
that in its growth and change, it encompasses these
seemingly divergent goals and remains a place of natural
beauty and a place of intense activity as well as a
community of stability for its residents and visitors
and a community of opportunity for its
businesses.
Specifically,
the Comprehensive Development Plan seeks to address
several challenges of growth and change:
#
The need to guide development throughout the City, as it
is faced with physical or functional changes.
#
The need to keep the City's resources and services
abreast of the projected demands for resources and
services, both for residents and visitors.
#
The need to assure stewardship of natural resources and
address the unique environmental demands of a coastal
community.
#
The need to plan and coordinate all changes in ways that
ensure the continued residential ambiance, resort
attractiveness, favorable business climate, and overall
health and well-being of the City.
Rehoboth
Beach is now and will remain a town within a town. It
has three sets of active users--residents, property
owners, and visitors. It has two physical identities --
residential community and resort. And it has two levels
of municipal service -- local and regional. Maintaining
balance among these various identities is a continuing
challenge of management for traffic, parking,
transportation choices, oceanfront land use, municipal
service, business stability, commercial and neighborhood
appearance, and governance. Rehoboth Beach will achieve
this balance, using the Comprehensive Development Plan
to give constant attention to the long-term foundations
of the community -- its ocean and beach, its adjacent
waterways, its residential and commercial neighborhoods,
its transportation network and alternative modes of
travel, and its public and private services.
The process
used to develop the Comprehensive Development Plan
centered on the creation of a "Vision" for Rehoboth
Beach. Initially conceived in 1996 by its residents and
property owners, the vision is a description of the City
as it should exist some 15 to 20 years in the future.
The vision does not focus on what is wrong, it focuses
on what is possible, and describes Rehoboth Beach as
though these possibilities have already been achieved.
It is built upon those aspects of Rehoboth that make it
a desirable place to live and work -- the beachfront,
its visitors, the quality of its residential areas, the
level of community services, and the nature of its
business community. Each of these elements has a strong
vision and value associated with it.
The vision
of a future Rehoboth Beach developed by the 1996 Long
Range Planning Committee was confirmed and refined by
the 2002 Planning Commission. Subcommittees of the
larger 1996 group – Residential Communities, Community
Design and Preservation, Commercial, Open Space,
Infrastructure, and Annexation – analyzed the vision
from their special perspectives and identified current
community trends and issues that would positively or
negatively affect the make-up of the vision. These
groups also identified ways to build upon or correct
these trends. These same elements were addressed by the
Planning Commission in 2002.
The ideas
about how to achieve the vision are the heart of the
Comprehensive Development Plan and are the basis of the
recommended actions necessary to create the Rehoboth of
the future.
3.2
The Visions
A Vision for
Water Resources:
Rehoboth
Beach's careful use and preservation of its ocean,
beach, canal, and adjacent waterways is at the heart of
its social and economic vitality.
The highest
priority in Rehoboth Beach is the care and protection of
its great natural resources -- the ocean, beach, canal,
lakes, and adjacent waterways. The City provides careful
access to the water, protects views to and from the
water, maintains an appropriate scale and use of
structures along the water, supplies the public
facilities necessary for users of the water, and works
collaboratively with State and federal agencies to
ensure their maintenance. The guiding principles are
preservation of the natural processes at work along the
ocean, beach, canal, inland bays, and lakes and
continuation of the neighborly appeal of Rehoboth's
water areas.
A Vision of
Town Character and Community Services:
Rehoboth
Beach is a year-round, full-service community with
seasonal tourism as its major industry. It maintains a
significant town infrastructure to serve all of its
community interests -- its natural environment, its
residences, its businesses, its tourists, and its
regional function.
Rehoboth
Beach is a self-sustaining and physically integrated
community where residents, property owners, and
tourists, be they retirees, business people,
individuals, or families may find a home, recreation,
security, and a sense of permanence and pride that
characterize our best towns. It is a careful blend of
residence and resort that draws a loyal tourist
clientele to its activities and places the car, bus, and
truck are accommodated, but the balance is “tilted” to
the pedestrian, the bicyclist, and other non-auto users.
It has identified the community-serving elements that
are critical to maintain living quality such as open
spaces, libraries, senior facilities, and places of
worship and strives to provide them. Particularly
important is the provision of 21st Century
technology to the community so that the best
communication access possible is available to
government, business, and neighbors. The town is not
only the key supplier of essential needs and services to
its own residents and visitors but also to the residents
of surrounding areas. This regional function helps
maintain services that the community cannot sustain on
its own. And just as it is constructed to accommodate
the variety of its citizens and visitors, its members
have built the organizations and tools for
self-determination necessary to achieve this
variety.
A Vision for
Neighborhoods
Rehoboth
Beach's residential areas are reminiscent of a "bygone"
era and reflect a small town
neighborliness.
Rehoboth
Beach is a retreat of green places, ocean spaces, and
pleasant memories. It is a community that takes special
pride in the care and appearance of its property,
buildings, and streets, in the quality and the
preservation of its natural environment, its history and
historic places, and in the retention of its places of
special beauty and interest. It gives continuous
attention to the physical connections between past and
present, between home and work, and between resident and
visitor. Its neighborhoods are orderly, walkable,
“bikeable,” and diverse in architecture, dwelling type,
spacing, and size. All property owners share
responsibility for the year-round care and appearance of
their properties.
A Vision for
Business
Rehoboth
Beach's downtown is a balanced mix of year-round and
seasonal businesses with a distinctive, pedestrian
character.
The downtown
of Rehoboth Beach is readily identifiable in extent,
non-uniform in its mix of businesses, and controlled in
architecture and signage. The “residential” scale of its
buildings is linked to its surroundings and the
pedestrian. It is oriented to walkers first, automobiles
second and contains a mix of private and public uses,
year-round and seasonal operations, and is dominated by
locally-owned, small businesses. All of the business
operators and property owners share a responsibility for
the year-round care and appearance of their
establishments as a way of maintaining the overall
viability of the downtown area.
4.
THE OCEAN, INLAND BAYS, AND WATERWAYS
The City’s Goals are to…
Maintain
physical and visual access to the ocean and other
waterbodies
Control the
scale and use of structures along the ocean and other
waterbodies
Protect the
natural functioning of ocean, bay, lake, and canal
ecology
4.1
The Ocean and Beach
|